Our similarities
and our government
Shannon Bohrer
(8/2019) While we have differences
between the members of our two major political parties, we
also have a lot in common. I believe our similarities are
sometimes greater than our differences, but we don’t see
them, possibly because we aren’t looking in that
direction. Maybe if we looked we might be surprised with
what we find. We can start with the American dream, which
holds that each successive generation will be better off
than the previous generation.
I believe it’s in our DNA to think
that we should always be improving. In our Declaration of
Independence it says "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men [all people] are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness… That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed." The majority of
people in both parties would agree with these lofty words,
at least the direction they imply.
While we can agree on most of the
words in our Declaration of Independence, there are people
that have a problem with the part that says, "Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
the consent of the governed." Some people just don’t like
the government.
According to the Pew Research
Center, in 1958 around seventy five percent of us trusted
our government. The trust declined in the 1960’s with the
Vietnam War and then again in the 1970’s with Watergate.
Every time the economy grew, confidence also grew and each
time the economy faltered, so did our confidence. After
911, the confidence in our government experienced a
30-year high, but just temporarily. Trust in our
government since 2007 has not exceeded 30 percent. A
peculiarity with the polling is that the party in office
has more faith in government - when they are in office. So
is the faith with the party, or with the government?
The "consent of the governed"
means we give the government the power to represent us.
That is a sticking point for many. While Americans say
they love their county, they are rarely complementary
about their government. In some ways I find this position
somewhat contradictory. It would be like me saying I love
my marriage, but I don’t trust my wife. It is
understandable that there are times when we are not happy
with our government, but it is our government – as we have
determined it.
"Let us never forget that
government is ourselves and not an alien power over us.
The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President
and senators and congressmen and government officials, but
the voters of this country." - Franklin D. Roosevelt.
The premise that we don’t trust
our government, can sometimes conflict with reality. In
September of 2009 at a political event in South Carolina a
person said, "Keep your government hands off my Medicare."
The problem for this person was, and maybe still is, that
Medicare is a government program. So, in essence if the
person likes their Medicare – they like a government
program. Obviously there are people that cannot admit that
they like somethings that the government does. Sometimes
it can be very difficult for some people to say anything
good about our government, even when they benefit from a
government program.
"I got a letter the other day from
a woman. She said, ‘I don’t want government –run health
care. I don’t want socialized medicine. And don’t touch my
Medicare." -President Obama’s addressing a town hall
meeting in July 28, 2009.
While many don’t trust our
government, we trust ourselves. We, in both parties,
believe that we are independent and responsible for our
own success. People need to be charge of their own lives;
they need to make their own choices and should be
responsible for their own success. Often coupled with this
belief is the idea that government interferes too much,
and hinders our ability to be independent.
While many have the belief that
being independent and responsible is ideal without
government interference, there is a contrary belief that
government interference in not always bad. Is government
interference or assistance required when we don’t have a
level playing field? Remember the part that says "We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men [all people]
are created equal..." While very idealistic, the reality
is that after being created, the equality often
disappears. Those that are born into wealth and privilege
are more likely to succeed, than those born into poverty.
We may be equal in the eyes of the creator at birth, but
that equality can change the moment after birth.
The ability to experience "Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…" can be dependent
upon equal opportunity and equal opportunity does not
always exist. We hear individuals from both parties
stating that every child should have the opportunities to
grow and flourish, but is the opportunity available for
everyone? We hear that we are supposed to pull ourselves
up by our bootstraps, but what happens when someone has no
boot straps, or they have no boots?
While we agree on much, we
sometimes disagree on what constitutes equal opportunity.
Does anyone really believe that the children in Flint
Michigan are on equal footing with children from other
cities? How many other Flint Michigan cities exist and
what is being done to correct the problem?
While some believe that the less
the government does, the freer we are to "Be all that we
can be", how does that fit with the idea of equal
opportunity? If the government is to ensure that each of
us is entitled to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness…", how does the government ensure a level
playing field? Maybe the question should be - can a
government ensure a level playing field? What the
government should do, or could do, to ensure equality
might describe a major political difference between the
two parties.
Since we are a nation that values
individualism, we should also expect disagreements, maybe
we should value them. The problems we have can divide our
political systems, but they also have the ability to unite
us. If we examine problems from the perspective of
resolving them – starting with what we both believe, we
might move in a better direction.
"What makes us Americans is our
shared commitment to an ideal - that all of us are created
equal, and all of us have the chance to make of our lives
what we will." - Barack Obama
Read other articles by Shannon Bohrer