December 2003
Sewer
Problems;
What is our Goal?
Over the past several weeks there has been many articles
in the local newspapers and letters received from the
Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) about
Emmitsburg spilling raw sewage. Unfortunately, a portion of
these articles and letters are correct. Like many other
municipalities in Maryland, Emmitsburg has had some sewage
spills. As most of the Emmitsburg residents know, Emmitsburg
has been troubled with several very old sewer (and water)
lines that have a considerable amount of damage to them.
Damage to these sewer lines allow "wild water" to get in to
the sanitary sewer system. Wild water is rainwater, melting
snow or water from flooded streams flowing over their banks.
The letter sent to MDE by a resident stated that the Town
had eleven (11) sewage spills in the month of September.
That statement was not correct. We know that one Town
official may have been aware of this letter before it was
sent to MDE, we know for certain that he was aware of it
soon after. However, in either case, there seem to be no
attempt from him to correct the error in the complainant.
MDE responded to the resident in writing and the Town
official shared a copy of MDE's response with his fellow
commissioners at the November 20 workshop meeting. MDE also
made a site visit to the Town's sewer plant which they
interview The Town's Sewer and Water Superintendent and
reviewed the Town's records. Although the Town's sewer and
water superintendent was able to provide MDE with all of the
proper reports and documentation to show that the alleged
spills did not happen as the complaint stated, it appears
that MDE is still somewhat suspicious of these alleged
spills.
The complaint letter was written after the October Town
meeting when the town manager reported that the sewer plant
exceeded its designed operating capacity eleven (11) days in
the month of September. Operating above the designed
operating capacity does not mean that the Town suffered from
a sewage spill and, it was not reported that the Town had
eleven (11) sewage spills in September. After the town
manager reads his report, the council president always asks
if any one from the council has any questions about the
report. No one from the town council at the meeting or after
the meeting questioned the report or verified that they
correctly understood the sewer problem that staff reported
on. That alone raises a serious question to me. If an
elected official believed that there were eleven (11) spills
in one month, but he was not told until the following month,
shouldn't the question at that time been "why weren't we
told about this sooner"?
There is no doubt that the Town has sewer and water line
problems, this is a problem that troubles every municipality
in the state. Not working together as a group and discussing
town issues openly prevents us from accomplishing our goals
in a timely and professional manner. This type of behind the
sense decision making has no positive effect on the Town. In
fact, it has a very poor effect on the town and its
employees. Filing this erroneous complaint with MDE may have
jeopardized the operators license and reputation of the
Town's sewer and water plant superintendent.
As I have said in many of my previous reports and
articles before, as long as the information is correct, I
have no problem with anyone reporting what the Town and its
elected officials are doing. However, it is disturbing to
receive letters and read newspaper articles written with
erroneous information. This complaint alone has wasted
several hours of the town staffs manpower in an effort to
address and follow up with MDE's inquiries. When a resident
files a complaint, he/she is not always expected to get all
the facts correct. When a town official, elected to serve
the Town in the best of his ability is aware of (or part of)
a complaint written with erroneous information, you have to
question what is his understanding of "the best of his
ability".
The town has been working on several issues to improve
problems with our sewer system. About three years ago, the
town re-lined a section of sewer line on the east side of
North Seton Ave. Just recently Provincial House and FEMA
re-lined a sewer line between their two facilities.
Currently the town is advertising for bids to replace the
sewer line that runs from the old Rutters store to North
Seton Ave., and we have also done some preventative
maintenance to the pumps and valves at the Creamery Road
pump station. So, it is not like the Town has just thrown
its hands in the air or said well it only happens when it
rains there's nothing we can do. We are working towards
improvements, we still have a very long way to go. The sewer
and water lines have been allowed to deteriorate to such
poor condition over the years that we can not fix all of
them over night. It will take several years of working
together to accomplish the much-needed repairs.
In closing, I will give you every date that the Town had
and reported a raw sewage spill in the 2003.
- January 2nd 1,000,000 gallons spilled
- January 3rd 200,000 gallons spilled
- February 5th 200 gallons spilled
- February 22 - 24th 50,000 gallons spilled
- April 8 - 9th 15,000 gallons spilled
- May 16th less than 1,000 gallons spilled
- September 3 - 4th 157,000 gallons spilled
- September 23rd 300,000 gallons spilled
- December 12th 171,000 gallons spilled
The above dates show a total of nine (9) spills for the
entire year. Except for the February 5th spill that was a
blocked sewer line on North Seton Avenue, all spills were
the cause of heavy rains and melting snow.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call the town office, or e-mail
me at mayorhoover@emmitsburgmd.gov
Respectfully,
Jim Hoover
Read Past Issues of
From Mayor Jim's Desk