Looking
forward and back
Bill Meredith
The sea was wet as wet could be, the sand
was dry as dry;
You could not see a cloud because no cloud was
in the sky.
No birds were flying overhead… there were no
birds to fly.
––Lewis Carroll
The year 2001 is gone, and I guess many would
say, "Good riddance," on the
assumption that beginning a new year means
having a chance to start over. It’s a nice
thought; would that it were so. Unfortunately
though, as someone has said, the past is
prologue; we can make New Year’s resolutions,
but in order to achieve them we will have to
overcome the consequences of a lot of goofs and
misjudgments we made last year and before. And
even if we overcome our own foul-ups, we are
still limited by the effects of what other
people have done. That’s one of the
consequences of living in an ecosystem; we’re
affected by what others do.
The passing of an old year and the beginning
of a new one should be a time of retrospection
and an occasion for optimism. So far, I’ve
managed the retrospection part, but the optimism
is proving to be harder to achieve. I spent the
first 67 years of my life writing dates that
began with 19__, and now before I’ve even
begun to get used to starting them with 20__,
here it is, 2002. To anyone older, there’s no
need to explain the confusion this causes, or
the sense of disorientation that goes with it;
and I suppose it’s not possible to explain it
to anyone much younger. My generation survived
the Great Depression, World War II, the cold
war, Viet Nam and Watergate; and having made it
through all those times, we thought we had
earned the right to be optimistic. But so far,
the new millennium hasn’t offered us much
encouragement.
I didn’t accomplish much in 2001; the only
saving grace is that, being retired, I didn’t
have to accomplish much. I managed to meet the
monthly deadlines for the Dispatch, although
usually at the last minute; I made some music
with the Mount’s jazz band; the garden did
well in spite of the drought; I planted some
trees, and my average golf score dropped by two
strokes. I added one species of bird, a snowy
owl, to my life list, which should qualify as an
accomplishment; the longer the list gets, the
harder it is to find species that aren’t
already on it.
On the whole, though, birdwatching was not a
success last year. I saw only 124 species of
birds in 2001; and while that number might
impress people who are not knowledgeable about
the subject, for a birdwatcher of any experience
it is a disappointment. To put it in
perspective, there have been several times in
the past that I’ve seen over 100 species in a
month, and I can recall two times when I saw 100
in a single day. In part, age is the
explanation; I can’t hear high-pitched sounds
as well as I used to, my visual reflexes are
slower, and I don’t have the energy to get out
into some of the habitats I used to visit. These
factors probably explain why I recorded only 10
species of warblers, even though many of them
are getting scarcer. Part of it was the weather;
because of the drought, I saw only 19 species of
waterfowl in the area, and those in fewer
numbers than in previous years.
But weather and
decrepitude are not the entire explanation; a
worrisome part is symptomatic of the ecological
problems facing a distracted world. Bird
populations are declining everywhere. For the
first time since I started keeping daily
records, I did not record a yellow-billed cuckoo—
a large bird, with a voice you can hear half a
mile away, that used to appear every day on my
summer lists. I saw only one pheasant, and no
bob-whites; both used to be common in the field
behind my house. The year’s lists show only
two sightings of the indigo bunting, a brightly
colored, noisy little bird that I used to see on
every walk in the summer months. Red-eyed
vireos, Maryland Yellowthroats, towhees, wood
pewees and tanagers were seen and heard less
often. All of these are declining throughout the
country; my observations simply corroborate the
national trends.
There are some well-known explanations for
the declines in bird populations: habitat
destruction and toxicity from industrial wastes
and pesticides are obvious problems. But it is
easy to oversimplify and potentially inaccurate
to generalize about such things. From the times
when canaries were used to detect gases in coal
mines, birds have been available as a warning
that we ourselves are in danger. All of the
reasons for their present decline in numbers can
be lumped under one heading: their ecosystem is
becoming unbalanced and is losing its stability.
And the root of our own problems lies in the
fact that we live in that same ecosystem; if the
birds are in trouble, we are too.
Things couldn’t have come to a head at a
worse time. The political establishment that
came to power a year ago had an
anti-environmental bias to begin with; and now,
with politically motivated tax cuts followed by
an unexpected war, the budget surplus we were
told would last 20 years is gone. At a time when
we should be spending money to improve food
distribution, reduce the emissions of industrial
pollutants and curb population growth, we are
forced to divert it instead to pay for blowing
up caves in Afghanistan and flying fighter planes
in circles over Catoctin Mountain 24 hours a
day.
It is inaccurate to say that Nero fiddled
while Rome burned (the violin wasn’t invented
until several centuries later), but it is true
that underlying problems got worse because he
ignored or didn’t recognize them. We are in a
similar situation now. No one can deny that we
have serious immediate problems, but we seem to
be dealing successfully with them; the Afgan war
so far has gone better than anyone predicted.
But while finishing that task, we must not
repeat Nero’s mistake by ignoring the more
serious underlying problems that ecologists have
been warning us about for decades.
My only basis for optimism now is that the
war on terrorism may teach us a larger lesson.
The 3,000 or more lives lost on September 11
were not trivial, yet many times that number are
lost each year in auto accidents, to say nothing
of the murders that occur daily in any large
city, while life goes on as usual. And yet the
loss of those 3,000 lives, plus four airplanes
and three buildings, produced major disruption
in an economy valued in the trillions of
dollars, in a nation of over 280 million people,
with ripple effects extending throughout the
entire world. The lesson is to remind us how
fragile our social and economic systems are; and
the hope is that somehow we as a voting public
may come to realize that the world ecosystem is
equally fragile. If the birds can help teach
that lesson, perhaps there still may be time for
optimism.